Categories: News

The Girl with a Glass Bauble Earring? Why Vermeer’s painting probably did not depict a real pearl

Vermeer’s model for The Girl with the Pearl Earring is probably sporting a glass teardrop-shaped bauble, not a real pearl. The painting, now the artist’s most popular work, has just gone on display in the Rijksmuseum’s major retrospective Vermeer.

In the exhibition catalogue the co-curator, Pieter Roelofs, points out that a pearl of this size would have been “astronomically expensive”. In the 17th century pearls mainly came from the strait between India and what is now Sri Lanka. In 1632 a Dutch jeweller paid £500 for a large pearl bought in London for a princess (this would now be equivalent to about £100,000 today), for what was probably a much smaller one than in the Vermeer painting.

Vermeer’s The Girl with the Pearl Earring

According to Roelofs, “in Vermeer’s work we are looking at imitation glass pearls, which in his time were mainly sold by Venetian glass blowers”. There has been speculation that the model may have been Vermeer’s eldest daughter Maria, who was born in 1655 or 1656 but she would have been only around ten at the time (the Mauritshuis, which owns the painting, dates it to 1665 and the current Rijksmuseum exhibition more loosely to 1664-67).

The picture only received its present title relatively recently, after a decision by the Mauritshuis curator Quentin Buvelot for the last Vermeer retrospective, held at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC and the Mauritshuis in The Hague in 1995-96. Until then it was often called the “Girl with the Turban”.

Tracy Chevalier’s book The Girl with the Pearl Earring (1999) and the subsequent film (2003) made the picture even more famous. It is now undoubtedly the popular star of the Mauritshuis collection. Although the Rijksmuseum’s current retrospective runs until 4 June, The Girl with the Pearl Earring is so important to the Mauritshuis that it will be returning early, going back on display in The Hague at the beginning of April.

The painting first re-emerged in 1881, as by an anonymous artist, selling for two guilders (less than £1). It was bequeathed to the Mauritshuis in 1903.

When we asked the museum’s director Martine Gosselink about the earring, she responded: “It is neither a pearl nor glass, simply paint.” Vermeer created it with just two quickly applied brushstrokes.

• Read more about the Rijksmuseum’s Vermeer exhibition (10 February-4 June) here

admin

Recent Posts

A pure symbiosis “PERFECT STORM” by Fridriks and Kaláb flourishes with beautiful art and personal endeavors

Venturing into unknown territory, artists Katrin Fridriks and Jan Kaláb took a chance on one…

4 days ago

Pushing the Boundaries of Artistic Expression with Twilight’s Tapestry: Traces of Time and Color

Pushing the boundaries of artistic expression, visionary artist Melissa Herrington’s large-scale, abstract paintings blur the boundaries between mediums,…

5 days ago

Alexandre Iakovleff: A Multifaceted Artist and His Journey Through Art

Alexandre Iakovleff (1887-1938) - famous Russian painter, graphic artist, master of drawing, portraitist, author of…

1 week ago

Danish Artist’s Baroque-Style Circus of Animals is Back in the U.S

Drawing inspiration from a wide breadth of sources, including ancient mythology, fairy tales and fables,…

2 weeks ago

Sena Kwon Shapes the Research Realm with Insightful Figures

It is irregular for illustrators to work alongside research and development industries, such as public…

3 weeks ago

Exhibited for the First Time in the U.S. – New Sculptures by Bjørn Okholm Skaarup {April 4 – May 15}

Beginning Thursday, April 4 and running through Thursday May 18, Cavalier Gallery is pleased to present the…

3 weeks ago