Damien Hirst’s New A.I. Project, Which Asked Collectors to Generate Their Own Paintings, Earned Him $20 Million in Nine Days

0
45

, Damien Hirst’s most recent project of A.I.-generated works, has proved a lucrative venture for the British artist and his technological collaborator, HENI. In a nine-day sale that ended on April 10, Hirst sold 5,508 paintings (5,109 physical artworks and 399 NFTs) and generated $20.9 million in revenue.

The project is a digital remix of Hirst’s from the 1990s and outsourced considerable creativity to collectors—albeit channeled through artificial intelligence.

Using HENI’s dashboard, collectors could determine the colors, style, size, and shape of the work they wanted to generate. claimed to push the boundaries of art and wow people, though, in reality, the experience of click-tinkering on HENI felt reminiscent of customizing a pair of sneakers on NikeID in the early 2010s.

Damien Hirst, (2023). Photo: Prudence Cuming Associates Ltd.

Regardless, collectors went big on , quite literally.

The largest size on offer for Hirst’s squares and circles (extra-large, 100cm in diameter) were the most lucrative, generating $11.6 million. Circles also proved nearly three times more popular than squares, and physical works more popular than digital ones—under 10 percent of the works created were NFTs.

This point on the enduring popularity of physical works was somewhat proved in Hirst’s previous project straddling the line of physical and digital art: 2021’s . Collectors were issued a physical and digital version of the same work and then forced to burn one of them. The majority opted to ditch their NFT for the physical Hirst.

Nonetheless, the project earned the artist upwards of $89 million, according to his book on the collection, .

Since gaining major art world attention in the late 1980s as part of the Young British Artists, Hirst’s work has come to be seen by collectors as a valuable investment. Somewhat perversely, Hirst has been one of his biggest collectors, courting controversy through engaging in unusual market practices such as buying back his own work, an act some have labelled market manipulation.

Despite this critique, as proven by , his work continues attract collectors—or investors, if you’re cynically minded.

 

More Trending Stories: 

A Roman-Era Vase, Once Considered a Cremation Vessel, Turns Out to Be an Early Form of Sports Memorabilia for a Gladiator Fan 

A Court Has Ruled That a Controversial Miriam Cahn Painting, Targeted by Far-Right Censors, Can Remain Hanging at the Palais de Tokyo 

Asia Society Walks Back Its Decision to Blur Depictions of the Prophet Muhammad in an Online Exhibition Following Accusations of Censorship 

Sotheby’s Glitch Art Sale, Which Was Paused Due to Online Backlash, Has Relaunched With a Newly Diverse Lineup of Artists 

Workers at a Brussels Museum Describe a ‘Toxic’ Work Environment Under Its Director’s Rule of ‘Terror’ 

An Australian Man Using a Budget Metal Detector Discovered a 10-Pound Chunk of Gold Worth $160,000 

A Rolls-Royce Driver Plowed Over a $3 Million Damien Hirst Sculpture on the Palm Beach Lawn of a Prominent Collector Couple 

The First Stained-Glass Depiction of Jesus as a Black Man Has Been Discovered in the Window of a Small Rhode Island Church 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here